<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just what is Moto thinking?</title>
	<link>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/</link>
	<description>Telecoms industry news and opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/#comment-390</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/#comment-390</guid>
					<description>Hi, my name is disman-kl, i like your site and i ll be back ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, my name is disman-kl, i like your site and i ll be back ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Masamu-no Otoosan</title>
		<link>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/#comment-61</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/#comment-61</guid>
					<description>1. As with many large successful companies, it's likely that Motorola does not have a good understanding of what actually drove their success in this area in the first place.  Sure, they will have at any time a reconstructive story to explain it, but that story's low correlation with the actual real factors is evidenced by their inability to duplicate the success - or even to sustain it.

2. Further complicating things is Motorola's characteristically short corporate attention span in the mobile space, usually of approximately fourteen months.  Look at any Motorola market initiative over the past ten years, and you can see this behavior pattern clearly - all the way back to the pseudo-Japanese "Hello Moto" campaign.  The useful thing for competitors to know regarding this is that they simply have to wait approximately a year and a half, and "Moto" will move on if the initiative is not meeting expectations.

3. I agree that the UIQ purchase is an act of desperation, or more accurately an expression of desperation.  Motorola is correct in assessing that their UI is in desperate need of improvement, but for a company making the amount of noise that Motorola is making about Linux to then turn around and buy part of UIQ is baffling.  The phrase "grasping at straws" was well-used here.  One resulting problem with this is that Motorola has worked so hard to seize the mobile Linux spotlight from other companies that are actually being productive in that space, and then they go and buy half of UIQ.  Thanks for throwing a hand grenade into the mobile Linux effort.

All I can say is, good luck Motorola, you have the resources and market power to dramatically help the industry and move it forward - don't screw it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. As with many large successful companies, it&#8217;s likely that Motorola does not have a good understanding of what actually drove their success in this area in the first place.  Sure, they will have at any time a reconstructive story to explain it, but that story&#8217;s low correlation with the actual real factors is evidenced by their inability to duplicate the success - or even to sustain it.</p>
<p>2. Further complicating things is Motorola&#8217;s characteristically short corporate attention span in the mobile space, usually of approximately fourteen months.  Look at any Motorola market initiative over the past ten years, and you can see this behavior pattern clearly - all the way back to the pseudo-Japanese &#8220;Hello Moto&#8221; campaign.  The useful thing for competitors to know regarding this is that they simply have to wait approximately a year and a half, and &#8220;Moto&#8221; will move on if the initiative is not meeting expectations.</p>
<p>3. I agree that the UIQ purchase is an act of desperation, or more accurately an expression of desperation.  Motorola is correct in assessing that their UI is in desperate need of improvement, but for a company making the amount of noise that Motorola is making about Linux to then turn around and buy part of UIQ is baffling.  The phrase &#8220;grasping at straws&#8221; was well-used here.  One resulting problem with this is that Motorola has worked so hard to seize the mobile Linux spotlight from other companies that are actually being productive in that space, and then they go and buy half of UIQ.  Thanks for throwing a hand grenade into the mobile Linux effort.</p>
<p>All I can say is, good luck Motorola, you have the resources and market power to dramatically help the industry and move it forward - don&#8217;t screw it up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nitin Kuchhal</title>
		<link>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/#comment-58</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.telecoms.com/2007/10/15/just-what-is-moto-thinking/#comment-58</guid>
					<description>Motorola is on a back-foot !?

When they should be putting out their best foot forward, they are being defensive. I really don't see how this would help Motorola in pioneering what they started. They made everyone look silly when they launched their Razr, a true benchmark phone is all aspects.

In my opinion, they  should restructure their Mobile Devices division (with all due respects to concerned people). Moto's strategies dwindle from time to time, which definitely is not a sign of good management.

Motorola's handsets are really good, but there are certain key areas where they lag. 

For example, the UI... It still is in stoneage, SE has one of the best UI (even its OSE based low end handsets). Samsung fares far better in this department (which I think is a sleeping giant).

Moto's handsets are also very fragile, drop them couple of times and you have a showpiece.

And many more...

Their move to buy into UIQ is really a smart move, this should give them an edge or rather sharpen their Razr even more.

Now I would prefer Moto focusing 75% of their time &#38; energy in reviving themselves through an onslaught of new and better handsets, and rest on rejuvenating existing lineup.

In all means I still feel that Moto is most innovative of all, and I would love to see them scale those heights again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola is on a back-foot !?</p>
<p>When they should be putting out their best foot forward, they are being defensive. I really don&#8217;t see how this would help Motorola in pioneering what they started. They made everyone look silly when they launched their Razr, a true benchmark phone is all aspects.</p>
<p>In my opinion, they  should restructure their Mobile Devices division (with all due respects to concerned people). Moto&#8217;s strategies dwindle from time to time, which definitely is not a sign of good management.</p>
<p>Motorola&#8217;s handsets are really good, but there are certain key areas where they lag. </p>
<p>For example, the UI&#8230; It still is in stoneage, SE has one of the best UI (even its OSE based low end handsets). Samsung fares far better in this department (which I think is a sleeping giant).</p>
<p>Moto&#8217;s handsets are also very fragile, drop them couple of times and you have a showpiece.</p>
<p>And many more&#8230;</p>
<p>Their move to buy into UIQ is really a smart move, this should give them an edge or rather sharpen their Razr even more.</p>
<p>Now I would prefer Moto focusing 75% of their time &amp; energy in reviving themselves through an onslaught of new and better handsets, and rest on rejuvenating existing lineup.</p>
<p>In all means I still feel that Moto is most innovative of all, and I would love to see them scale those heights again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
