<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti mast campaign takes new turn</title>
	<link>http://blog.telecoms.com/2008/02/29/anti-mast-campaign-takes-new-turn/</link>
	<description>Telecoms industry news and opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Allan</title>
		<link>http://blog.telecoms.com/2008/02/29/anti-mast-campaign-takes-new-turn/#comment-1354</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.telecoms.com/2008/02/29/anti-mast-campaign-takes-new-turn/#comment-1354</guid>
					<description>Advertising works - right...

Instead of fining O2 in the year 'government + 2', why not insist that O2 proudly boasts it has the smallest network in the UK and boldly display to users that they can't go to XX as there is no coverage. This should sufficiently rile enough people to effectively fine the company by reducing the chance of getting new customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising works - right&#8230;</p>
<p>Instead of fining O2 in the year &#8216;government + 2&#8242;, why not insist that O2 proudly boasts it has the smallest network in the UK and boldly display to users that they can&#8217;t go to XX as there is no coverage. This should sufficiently rile enough people to effectively fine the company by reducing the chance of getting new customers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
